Background

Motivation

If users ask how they can secure their e-mail the answer should be as simple as: use an Autocrypt-enabled mail app!

Why improve e-mail? E-Mail has been declared dead many times but refuses to die. It remains the largest open federated identity and messaging ecosystem, anchors the web and mobile phones. E-Mail continues to relay sensitive information between people and organisations. It has problems but do you prefer the proprietary, easy-to-track mobile phone number system to become the single source of digital identification?

Why a new approach to e-mail encryption? Encrypted e-mail has been around for decades, but has failed to see wide adoption outside of specialist communities, in large part because of difficulties with user experience and certification models. Autocrypt first aims to provide convenient encryption that is neither perfect nor as secure as traditional e-mail encryption, but is convenient enough for much wider adoption.

The Social Autocrypt Approach

The Autocrypt project is driven by a diverse group of mail app developers, hackers and researchers who are willing to take fresh approaches, learn from past mistakes, and collectively aim to increase the overall encryption of E-Mail in the net. The group effort was born and named “Autocrypt” on December 17th 2016 by ~20 people during a 5-day meeting at the OnionSpace in Berlin. Follow up meetings took place in March 2017 around the Internet Freedom festival and during a subsequent gathering in Freiburg, Germany. It remains a dynamic, fun process which is open to new people, influences and contributions. See contact channels and upcoming events on how you may talk with us and who “we” are currently.

The Technical Autocrypt Approach

Autocrypt uses regular E-Mail messages between people to piggyback necessary information to allow encrypting subsequent messages; it adds a new Autocrypt E-Mail header for transferring public keys and driving encryption behaviour. By default, key management is not visible to users. See below for more details about the differences from other attempts at providing encrypted e-mail.

We are following this approach step-by-step using different “Levels” of implementation compliance. Driven by usability concerns, we are refining and implementing Level 1 in several mail apps during 2017, aiming for a release at the end of 2017 which marks the first real-life implementation milestone. If you are interested to learn more or want to help please join our channels and look at where we meet next.

See Current docs (work-in-progress) for an index of all docs and discussion results so far.

Design Differences From Previous Approaches

End-to-end encrypted e-mail has been around for decades, but has failed to see wide adoption outside of specialist communities, in large part because of difficulties with user experience and certification models. To better understand how the Autocrypt effort is different from previous ones here are some of its features:

  • Protect first against passive data-collecting adversaries, resist the temptation to early-add complexity which aim to prevent active attacks. See RFC7435 A New Perspective for some motivation of this and the next points.
  • Focus on incremental deployment, always consider that there will be both Autocrypt-enabled mail apps and traditional plain ones, interacting with each other.
  • Don’t ask users anything about keys, ever. Minimize and usability-test what needs to be decided by users and include resulting UI guidance in the specs. Minimize friction for people using multiple mail apps with their accounts.
  • Go for mail app changes only, don’t require changes from mail providers or don’t depend on third party services, allowing fluid development of deployable code and specs. Ensure mail implementors can actually implement and influence the spec.
  • Use decentralized, in-band key discovery. Make mail apps tell each other how and when to encrypt to each other. Send this information in a way that is hidden from users of non-autocrypt mail clients to avoid confusing them.